Creation vs evolution
Let's address another important confusion involving our origins and development as a species. As mentioned in the 'loosh explained' article, we are polarised beings and as a result, our thinking always leans towards one extreme or another. Never has there been a smokescreen so misleading as the one of evolution vs creation. It is so cleverly played out that not many see between the lines to the truth of the matter, which is, that both are true. Creation and evolution are no opposites, and this fabricated war of thought just obscures what can be revealed with minimal study into the mechanics of evolution. We always get the religious community who don't have the scientific understanding and nomenclature to punch the right holes in evolution theory as the source of our origins. Then we have the scientific community who have submerged themselves in so much data from trial and error, that their inflated egos assume they have everything pinned down to indisputable facts, and lack the feeling consciousness to 'know' they are part of a bigger picture.
To put this dilemma to rest is to not partake in the 'either' 'or' approach at all, and see that the reason we observe close genetic and structural similarities between species, but not find the adjoining species in between within the fossil records, is because the basic templates of organisms were built upon and modified, and because the act of modification was then written into the DNA, it's only natural that the created will create...and keep creating, which is what we call evolution, an on going creative process. Evolution can explain lots of changes within species in a myriad ways, in a forever changing environment, naturally the inhabitants must also be forever changing to 'survive'. To refute the existence of evolution is ridiculous, we are avalanched by the evidence all around us daily. But evolution theory cannot give us a starting point to organic matter on a planet, nor can it provide evidence of one species changing into another, just of gradual adaptations within species. This indicates that we didn't evolve through linear time from bacteria into humans while on Earth, but rather that the basic blueprint of bacteria was built upon and developed. Once the carbon-oxygen cycle was established, the basic requirements were born, that of energy absorption, emission and metabolism, everything on the planet must physically 'take from' and 'give back' to in some way.
It is often assumed that it is possible that given enough random pieces of RNA lying around and some turbulent weather and landscaping, that DNA will spring into existence, which is quite probably less likely than winning the lottery 9 times in a row, or of the pieces of a broken cup being kicked and causing the cup to reorganize itself into its former glory.
We don't need a deity in mind to perceive the creative process of gene manipulation, we're in the rudimentary stages of understanding this ourselves, even as a type 0 species. The main difficulty in trying to perceive how we were designed and created, is that the conditions and rules of other dimensions are alien to us, meaning our 'reverse engineering' cannot provide us with a beginning point, simply because 'beginning' and 'end' are concepts relevant only in this dimension we experience on the physical plane. Our collective ego can only deny that we are in a Petri dish, even though the resemblance of cosmological phenomena to sub-atomic interactions is undeniable. We are told many falsehoods by our leading authorities about our history which confuse matters further. It is being realized now that stars, black holes and supernova are the tools used to generate life in the physical universe, one can even see egg shaped clouds of recycled matter which eventually develop into galaxies through a birthing process. Planets can be swung around black holes to accelerate the formation of their cores, or to introduce them to new star systems which needed to catch up. It's known by few here on Earth now for certain that our moon is a false satellite, brought into orbit to increase arable land fourfold, around 12000 years ago. It's the only body in space which orbits a planet with the same hemisphere facing the planet forever, the odds of this occurring accidentally are less than impossible, not to mention that it's a hollow structure which rings like a bell for 3 days when charges are let off on the surface. There are industrial machines on and in the moon, of a size that we are nowhere near capable of manufacturing. When the moon was installed, it's gravitation caused the earth to tilt and return continuously in a recurring cosmic wobble, which means crops over a broader surface of the planet get the much needed sunlight to flourish, and the ocean's current is stabilised as a result, giving us the fairly predictable tides we have today.
The creation of this process is still ongoing, there wasn't a completion date by which things were left to there own devices, but with our conscious minds locked into a linear timeline, we can't pin down a sensible chronological order for the development of life.
Religion is a bane in the side of humanity, although it may appear that science is desperate to disprove the idea of a god or creator, in actual fact, the control mechanisms in place which decide what our children learn in school and university, are heavily guided by religious protocol. Numerous valid books, scientists and theories are ridiculed and pushed out of print because they shine light on a broader truth about the bigger cosmological picture of our earth. Nikola Tesla was erased from public credit simply because his work offered the potential of raising mankind out of the private ownership of fossil fuel dependency. If you are still of the mindset that clean energy would be used commercially if it could just be made practical, then you seriously need to wake up and do some research before the internet is totally monopolized, after all, the Nazi submarines were sunk after the war so that their much cleaner hydrogen chloride engines were never realised and reinvented, not because we feared them being used against us.
Many studies have been done regarding evolution, and it is generally found that there is ceiling limit of efficiency for an organism which has undergone major change through evolution. What this means is that when we push an organisms ability to change to its limit, other aspects of its 'survivability' suffer greatly, as if to suggest that the original blueprint contains vital hierarchies of genetic information which become corrupted as change is accelerated. So imagine what our 'survivability' would be like if we had evolved in a linear fashion through time from bacteria. We'd probably die from a simple cold virus.
I've kept the writing simple in this blog as I want it to be relatable to everyone who comes across it. I'm quite sure if you look into biology and evolution deep enough as I have, you'll come to the same conclusion, if not, leave a comment and we'll discuss it further.
As long as the big bang is being accepted as truth, you can guarantee the religious nuts of this world are filtering our perception of reality, and remaining at the top of the power pyramid. The big bang was formulated by a scientist to fit the religious story of creation, for as long as we believe there was a beginning, we can believe there is a god who started it all off. When in actual fact, our universe is eternal, which is why any investigation into our sun's origin being in another star system is ridiculed, when it's actually true. Venus is also an alien planet to our solar system, but any investigation which leads the mind towards understanding that the universe is much older than we are told, gets quashed, ridiculed and disinformed away. Because if we realise that the universe is actually limitless, then it becomes clear that god didn't make everything, and we are no longer little special children of god in the centre of the universe. There are hints and clues all over the earth and beyond if your mind is not funneled by specialized academic learning, like the fact that there are two plankton blooms each year in the oceans, even though we are told that we are only affected by our own suns ultraviolet light. It's becoming apparent now even to amateurs that galaxies affect each other, swap planets and share particles all the time, there are paintings and carvings from ancient cultures which clearly show two sun's in the sky, was this before Sirius spat us out around 3 billion years ago after a supernova explosion? When viewed from our tiny perspective, of course all of these cosmological collisions and explosions look like a big random interplay between heavenly bodies, but with the Petri dish perspective, it's clear that the outcomes were intended and inevitable calculations based on knowledge we currently do not posess. Our creators are operating on a much higher frequency than we live on, and their agenda is the generation of an energy we cannot possibly understand in human form. This is achieved through the struggle to survive and the death process of organic beings in a carbon-oxygen cycle, their garden (our earth) is the perfect loosh producer, and was engineered that way. But the creators have no on going interest in our morals or development, they don't judge us according to any particular standard. There are thousands of similar gardens/planets in our galaxy alone, some with unexpected species at the top of their food chains, and most do not enjoy the ability to see into space as easily as us, due to their atmospheres being too thick, earth is rather unique in this respect. Our creators have utilized other semi-organic beings to do their seeding, we have records in our own tiny history of visits and interaction with these beings sometimes referred to as 'the collectors' or 'annunaki'.
To put this dilemma to rest is to not partake in the 'either' 'or' approach at all, and see that the reason we observe close genetic and structural similarities between species, but not find the adjoining species in between within the fossil records, is because the basic templates of organisms were built upon and modified, and because the act of modification was then written into the DNA, it's only natural that the created will create...and keep creating, which is what we call evolution, an on going creative process. Evolution can explain lots of changes within species in a myriad ways, in a forever changing environment, naturally the inhabitants must also be forever changing to 'survive'. To refute the existence of evolution is ridiculous, we are avalanched by the evidence all around us daily. But evolution theory cannot give us a starting point to organic matter on a planet, nor can it provide evidence of one species changing into another, just of gradual adaptations within species. This indicates that we didn't evolve through linear time from bacteria into humans while on Earth, but rather that the basic blueprint of bacteria was built upon and developed. Once the carbon-oxygen cycle was established, the basic requirements were born, that of energy absorption, emission and metabolism, everything on the planet must physically 'take from' and 'give back' to in some way.
It is often assumed that it is possible that given enough random pieces of RNA lying around and some turbulent weather and landscaping, that DNA will spring into existence, which is quite probably less likely than winning the lottery 9 times in a row, or of the pieces of a broken cup being kicked and causing the cup to reorganize itself into its former glory.
We don't need a deity in mind to perceive the creative process of gene manipulation, we're in the rudimentary stages of understanding this ourselves, even as a type 0 species. The main difficulty in trying to perceive how we were designed and created, is that the conditions and rules of other dimensions are alien to us, meaning our 'reverse engineering' cannot provide us with a beginning point, simply because 'beginning' and 'end' are concepts relevant only in this dimension we experience on the physical plane. Our collective ego can only deny that we are in a Petri dish, even though the resemblance of cosmological phenomena to sub-atomic interactions is undeniable. We are told many falsehoods by our leading authorities about our history which confuse matters further. It is being realized now that stars, black holes and supernova are the tools used to generate life in the physical universe, one can even see egg shaped clouds of recycled matter which eventually develop into galaxies through a birthing process. Planets can be swung around black holes to accelerate the formation of their cores, or to introduce them to new star systems which needed to catch up. It's known by few here on Earth now for certain that our moon is a false satellite, brought into orbit to increase arable land fourfold, around 12000 years ago. It's the only body in space which orbits a planet with the same hemisphere facing the planet forever, the odds of this occurring accidentally are less than impossible, not to mention that it's a hollow structure which rings like a bell for 3 days when charges are let off on the surface. There are industrial machines on and in the moon, of a size that we are nowhere near capable of manufacturing. When the moon was installed, it's gravitation caused the earth to tilt and return continuously in a recurring cosmic wobble, which means crops over a broader surface of the planet get the much needed sunlight to flourish, and the ocean's current is stabilised as a result, giving us the fairly predictable tides we have today.
The creation of this process is still ongoing, there wasn't a completion date by which things were left to there own devices, but with our conscious minds locked into a linear timeline, we can't pin down a sensible chronological order for the development of life.
Religion is a bane in the side of humanity, although it may appear that science is desperate to disprove the idea of a god or creator, in actual fact, the control mechanisms in place which decide what our children learn in school and university, are heavily guided by religious protocol. Numerous valid books, scientists and theories are ridiculed and pushed out of print because they shine light on a broader truth about the bigger cosmological picture of our earth. Nikola Tesla was erased from public credit simply because his work offered the potential of raising mankind out of the private ownership of fossil fuel dependency. If you are still of the mindset that clean energy would be used commercially if it could just be made practical, then you seriously need to wake up and do some research before the internet is totally monopolized, after all, the Nazi submarines were sunk after the war so that their much cleaner hydrogen chloride engines were never realised and reinvented, not because we feared them being used against us.
Many studies have been done regarding evolution, and it is generally found that there is ceiling limit of efficiency for an organism which has undergone major change through evolution. What this means is that when we push an organisms ability to change to its limit, other aspects of its 'survivability' suffer greatly, as if to suggest that the original blueprint contains vital hierarchies of genetic information which become corrupted as change is accelerated. So imagine what our 'survivability' would be like if we had evolved in a linear fashion through time from bacteria. We'd probably die from a simple cold virus.
I've kept the writing simple in this blog as I want it to be relatable to everyone who comes across it. I'm quite sure if you look into biology and evolution deep enough as I have, you'll come to the same conclusion, if not, leave a comment and we'll discuss it further.
As long as the big bang is being accepted as truth, you can guarantee the religious nuts of this world are filtering our perception of reality, and remaining at the top of the power pyramid. The big bang was formulated by a scientist to fit the religious story of creation, for as long as we believe there was a beginning, we can believe there is a god who started it all off. When in actual fact, our universe is eternal, which is why any investigation into our sun's origin being in another star system is ridiculed, when it's actually true. Venus is also an alien planet to our solar system, but any investigation which leads the mind towards understanding that the universe is much older than we are told, gets quashed, ridiculed and disinformed away. Because if we realise that the universe is actually limitless, then it becomes clear that god didn't make everything, and we are no longer little special children of god in the centre of the universe. There are hints and clues all over the earth and beyond if your mind is not funneled by specialized academic learning, like the fact that there are two plankton blooms each year in the oceans, even though we are told that we are only affected by our own suns ultraviolet light. It's becoming apparent now even to amateurs that galaxies affect each other, swap planets and share particles all the time, there are paintings and carvings from ancient cultures which clearly show two sun's in the sky, was this before Sirius spat us out around 3 billion years ago after a supernova explosion? When viewed from our tiny perspective, of course all of these cosmological collisions and explosions look like a big random interplay between heavenly bodies, but with the Petri dish perspective, it's clear that the outcomes were intended and inevitable calculations based on knowledge we currently do not posess. Our creators are operating on a much higher frequency than we live on, and their agenda is the generation of an energy we cannot possibly understand in human form. This is achieved through the struggle to survive and the death process of organic beings in a carbon-oxygen cycle, their garden (our earth) is the perfect loosh producer, and was engineered that way. But the creators have no on going interest in our morals or development, they don't judge us according to any particular standard. There are thousands of similar gardens/planets in our galaxy alone, some with unexpected species at the top of their food chains, and most do not enjoy the ability to see into space as easily as us, due to their atmospheres being too thick, earth is rather unique in this respect. Our creators have utilized other semi-organic beings to do their seeding, we have records in our own tiny history of visits and interaction with these beings sometimes referred to as 'the collectors' or 'annunaki'.
Comments
Post a Comment